An heir is ordered, for concealment of estate assets (recel successoral), to return to the estate the equivalent of nearly a million dollars, with interest since 1989. The notary appointed for the partition draws up a liquidation statement that distinguishes the mass to be divided excluding the concealment, 784,190.52 €, from the estate’s gross assets, 2,641,064.92 €, sums to be returned included. For his fees, the first president of the Paris Court of Appeal retains the smaller mass: the concealment claim, unrecoverable, is worth zero. On 2 April 2026 the Cour de cassation (the French supreme court for civil matters) quashed that ruling in a reported decision: the proportional partition fee is computed on the gross assets, and the gross assets included those sums. The case sets against each other two ways of counting, the value stated in the deed and the recovery value, which a valuer meets in every estate that contains claims.
The facts
By a judgment of 4 July 2012 a Court of Appeal appoints a notary to conduct the accounts, liquidation and partition of an estate, and orders one of the heirs, for concealment, to return to the estate the euro equivalent of 966,938.03 US dollars, with statutory interest from 30 November 1989. The notary draws up a final draft liquidation statement on 6 September 2018; a judgment of 12 May 2023 approves most of it.
The court registry issues a verification certificate for the fees at 7,574.13 €; the president of the court taxes them at 10,123.63 € including VAT, and the first president of the Paris Court of Appeal confirms on 28 November 2023. His reasoning: the sum owed by the concealing heir, whose unrecoverable nature was known to the parties at the time of partition, cannot be assimilated to the capital stated in the deed; it falls to the taxing judge to fix its market value, “namely zero”, by reference to tax rules, “which makes the basis of the fee coincide on this point with that of the tax”.
The decision
The second civil chamber quashed the order (Cass. 2e civ., 2 April 2026, no. 24-12.467, reported), under articles A. 444-53, A. 444-54 and A. 444-121 of the Commercial Code. Proportional fees “are charged on the capital stated in the deeds, increased by the value of the charges appearing in those deeds, or on the valuation retained for the assessment of duties and taxes if higher”; only “if the method of calculation provided in the preceding paragraph cannot be applied” does one move to the estimated value declared and then, failing agreement, to “the market value determined by the judge in charge of taxation”. And “voluntary or judicial partition gives rise to a fee proportional to the gross assets, after deduction of specific legacies only”.
The first president had himself found that the draft deed distinguished the active mass excluding the concealment of 784,190.52 € from the gross assets of 2,641,064.92 € including the sums to be returned. By ruling as he did “while finding that the estate’s gross assets of 2,641,064.92 euros included the sums to be returned to the estate by the heir who committed the concealment”, he failed to draw the legal consequences of his own findings. Remittal to the first president of the Paris Court of Appeal, differently composed.
What this changes for valuation
Two values for one claim. A claim of the estate against an heir, whether from concealment, from a contribution owed or from a loan, has a nominal value, the one stated in the deed, and a recovery value, which depends on the debtor’s solvency and on what set-off against his rights can absorb. For the partition accounts, the second governs the outcome: here the claim was set off against the equalising payment owed by the other co-heirs, reducing their claim against the heir. For the fee basis, the first applies: the tariff refers to the gross assets stated, and the taxing judge may substitute a market value only if that capital cannot serve as a basis.
What it costs. The proportional partition fee is computed on degressive brackets of the gross assets; the gap between a basis of 784,000 € and one of 2.64 million euros amounts to thousands of euros, between the contested taxation of a little over 10,000 € including VAT and what the new basis will yield. Parties to a judicial partition should know this before debating the composition of the mass: every claim entered in the gross assets, even set off, even doubtful, raises the costs.
The valuer’s role in the mass. The liquidation statement rests on values: real property at the date closest to partition, company shares, claims. The valuer supplies those of the buildings and securities with their references and, when asked, a recovery value for claims, documenting the debtor’s solvency, security, limitation and accrued interest; here, thirty-five years of statutory interest on a capital denominated in dollars. The report always separates nominal and recoverable, because both serve, one for costs, the other for the accounts.
Aligning the fee with the tax, an argument rejected. The first president wanted to retain the tax value of the claim so that the fee basis matched that of the duties. The Court does not follow: the tariff has its own hierarchy, stated capital first. A valuation for tax purposes, which admits a doubtful claim at its probable value, does not transpose automatically to fees; a valuer producing a valuation for the estate tax return knows this and does not present the figures as valid for every purpose.
Concealment and its price. The concealing heir loses his share of the concealed assets and must return them; the value of what he returns is fixed at the day of partition, with interest where sums are involved. When the concealed asset is a building or an invested sum, that is a valuation at a date, to which the valuer contributes, and which enters the gross assets, with the consequences the ruling describes.
What the valuer takes from it
- The proportional partition fee is computed on the gross assets stated in the deed, claims against an heir included, after deduction of specific legacies only.
- The taxing judge substitutes a market value for the stated capital only if that capital cannot serve as a basis; an unrecoverable claim stays in the basis.
- A claim of the estate has a nominal value, for costs, and a recovery value, for the accounts; the report presents both.
- The tax value of a doubtful claim does not transpose automatically to the fee basis.
- Concealed sums are returned at their value on the day of partition, interest included, and enter the gross assets.
Further reading
The Market value page describes the assignment, its timescale and its fee. The guides Standard court mission: market value for a partition and Leaving a family joint ownership in France and the glossary entries rapport des donations and soulte complement this article. On the same theme: Gift rapport: property given on again is valued at that date and Joint ownership: loan repaid by one co-owner follows article 815-13. The decision is available on Légifrance.
What next
An estate with doubtful claims, contributions or concealment, and a mass to quantify?
I establish the value of the assets and claims making up the estate, separating the gross assets stated in the deed from the probable recovery value, so that the accounts and the costs of the partition rest on justified figures.
Free quote, by email or by phone. No commitment before the quote is accepted. Fees are never linked to the value of the property (Charte de l’expertise, Title I, §2.1).
